| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Craig

Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 6730
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 2:14 pm Post subject: Type 3 Narrowed beams |
|
|
I thought this was the place for discusion on what people have used and planned to use for running a narrowed beam on their type 3.
I'm building a ball joint type 1 beam with lever shocks what are other people thinking? _________________ "They say the definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result" The Hives |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blistered

Joined: 28 Sep 2005 Posts: 1380 Location: Coventry
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Beat me to it.. lol
Ok.. I've heard balljoint is the usual route.. but....
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=697432
That looks like its going to be using K&L extremeties.. ?!
The biggest thing I'm bothered about is how much butchering is required to do it. I always like to have the option to go back to stock if I want to. Anyone know? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rob E

Joined: 18 Jul 2004 Posts: 6943 Location: Stratford-upon-Avon
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cool K&L- ideal!
looks like this the way to go.........
 _________________ www.evilbens.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blistered

Joined: 28 Sep 2005 Posts: 1380 Location: Coventry
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yup.. as much slam as you want without the issues of balljoints
I guess you could use the front brakes off a bug then too? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig

Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 6730
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are 2 ways of doing it, one way you make a piece that goes around the round tube so that it mounts using the original type 3 clamp and the other bolts up thru brackets like on a bug. This type of mounting allows you to run much lower as you can cut off the troublesome lower clamping bolt that tends to grind out. _________________ "They say the definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result" The Hives |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Foxy

Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 4240 Location: Tamworth, Staffs.
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've done mine slightly different to what I've seen anywhere but I'm not broadcasting pics of it just yet so you will have to wait and see.
It is a balljoint beam though narrowed 4 inches. I wouldn't worry about the balljoints bottoming out Blistered because I've had mine with the front valance touching the floor no probs.
Personally I didn't want to mod the framehead in any way, not even the bottom bolt clamp, thats why I'll be running air shocks.
The other issue is that of the castor angle. No one in the US seems to mention this issue. A bug beam is designed to sit at 90 degrees on the frame head and the castor is built into the arms. A type 3 beam has the castor built into the mounting, so by design it is laid back. I've overcome this by slotting in some castor shims behind the top beam, only one set at the minute but it might need more. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blistered

Joined: 28 Sep 2005 Posts: 1380 Location: Coventry
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice one Foxy, that's pretty much what I understood to be the case. Are you going down the clamp route then?
Any chance I could pop over and have a look cos I don't really want to be chopping the framehead either, as said ^^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig

Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 6730
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah Foxy is right linkpin is not necessary as you can drop a type 3 on the pan and still run B/J. A s for running early beetle brakes its a bad idea as the brake proportioning is set up for large drums front and rear and would be a bitch with the weight of a type 3 loading up those skinny front drums off a bug. You'd have to change to after market disc brakes, if you run 5 on 205 pcd wheels.
I too am doing something a bit different but I've got nothing to hide as I've been going on about my design for years and no one has done it yet AFAIK
I'm possibly looking at 100mm out of the beam depending on some calculations I need to finalize but this won't look as much due to the offset on the Enkei rims _________________ "They say the definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result" The Hives |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Foxy

Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 4240 Location: Tamworth, Staffs.
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blistered wrote: | Nice one Foxy, that's pretty much what I understood to be the case. Are you going down the clamp route then?
Any chance I could pop over and have a look cos I don't really want to be chopping the framehead either, as said ^^ |
Yes it mounts completely as standard.
You can come over when you pick up those front brakes.  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blistered

Joined: 28 Sep 2005 Posts: 1380 Location: Coventry
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How you planning on using the lever shocks Craig? Mounted on the side of the beam or to the bodywork?
Last edited by blistered on Tue 25 Nov, 2008 7:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blistered

Joined: 28 Sep 2005 Posts: 1380 Location: Coventry
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Foxy wrote: | | blistered wrote: | Nice one Foxy, that's pretty much what I understood to be the case. Are you going down the clamp route then?
Any chance I could pop over and have a look cos I don't really want to be chopping the framehead either, as said ^^ |
Yes it mounts completely as standard.
You can come over when you pick up those front brakes.  |
Shit.. forgot about them!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig

Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 6730
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This isn't mounted on the right end of the beam in this photo as I was just checking it was all in line (it wasn't due to my schoolboy error) _________________ "They say the definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result" The Hives |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig

Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 6730
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rob E wrote: |
looks like this the way to go.........
 |
I personally don't like that mount as the ones I am hoping to build for mine should resolve the castor issues.
Foxy are beetle beams actually 90deg to the frame head or just approximately? It would make life so much easier if they were totally vertical  _________________ "They say the definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result" The Hives |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blistered

Joined: 28 Sep 2005 Posts: 1380 Location: Coventry
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Is there actually any reason for NOT using a linkpin beam? Or is it just the cost factor? Or would the right be better from a balljoint front end? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig

Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 6730
|
Posted: Tue 25 Nov, 2008 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Use what you have to hand, but a link pin beam is fine for the application, that's what KCW tend to go for, take a scan thru their forum at www.kustomcoachwerks.com they are really the guys who mastered this beam set up originally (I just looked at your link and yeah KCW are the shit hot at this stuff  _________________ "They say the definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result" The Hives |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|